Why do some fish fight more than others?
نویسندگان
چکیده
Reversible changes in how readily animals fight can be explained in terms of adaptive responses to differences in the costs and benefits of fighting. In contrast, long-term differences in aggressiveness raise a number of questions, including why animals are consistent with respect to this trait, why aggressiveness is often linked to general risk taking, and why aggressive and nonaggressive animals often coexist within a population. In fish, different levels of aggressiveness bring several direct fitness-related consequences, such as when aggressive individuals monopolize a limited food supply and grow fast. They also bring indirect consequences, such as when aggressive fish are more susceptible to predation and when they require a larger respiratory surface to service a higher metabolic rate. Fitness consequences of aggressiveness are often context dependent, with aggressive fish tending to do well in simple, predictable conditions but not in complex, less predictable conditions. The diverse, context-dependent consequences of aggression mean that aggressive and nonaggressive fish flourish in different conditions and explain in general terms why these behavioral phenotypes often coexist. There are a number of candidate evolutionary frameworks for explaining why individual differences in aggressiveness are often, but not always, consistent over time and often, but not always, linked to differences in general risk taking.
منابع مشابه
Why Do the Results of Studies on the Effectiveness of Pralidoxime for Treatment of Organophosphate Poisoning Vary?
Organophosphate (OP) compounds are frequently used agorchemicals for deliberate self-harm in some parts of the world resulting in high mortality and morbidity. Pralidoxime (2PAM) is the most widely used and trialed oxime for treatment of OP poisoning. There have been variations over the results of trials using 2PAM for OP poisoning. 2PAM therapy has led to favorable outcomes in some studies, wh...
متن کاملSymbolic Victory Signaling Strength through Battlefield Choice (Paper in Progress)
Strong states can fight riskier battles in order to signal their strength and conclude wars. I open with the broad question, why do some battles end wars, while others do not? I argue that Clausewitz’ conception of decisive victory does not describe the majority of war-deciding engagements. The larger literature on bargaining and war proves equally unhelpful: while it predicts war termination s...
متن کاملPanel Data 1: Discrete Time Methods for the Analysis of Event Histories
Often, we are interested not only in whether an event occurs, but how quickly it happens (if at all). What factors speed up or delay death? Why do some friendships last longer than others? What causes some conflicts to be resolved quickly, while others drag on for years or even decades? Why do some individuals get tenure sooner than do others? Why do some people marry at young ages while others...
متن کاملFactoring Health Equations; Comment on “Do You Recommend an Interdisciplinary Field to Your Graduate Student?”
The International Journal of Health Policy and Management (IJHPM) is a new journal that aims to stimulate not only inter-disciplinary research relating to health, but even an entire new generation of such journals. The challenges of improving human health worldwide clearly suggest ‘why’ such a journal is needed, but ‘how’ bridges and junctions across fields of study towards this end might be fo...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Physiological and biochemical zoology : PBZ
دوره 85 6 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2012